About the IBA

   Join the IBA

   Legal Practice Division

   Public & Professional Interest
   Division

   Bar Associations

   Human Rights / Rule of Law

   Conferences

   Publications

   Education and Internships

   Members' Directory

   Charitable Foundations

   IBA Press Cuttings

   Sponsorship Opportunities


LexisNexis
 

HRI header
About the HRI Work by Regions  ICC   Media  Publications



Indonesia

The IBAHRI, in collaboration with a variety of commercial, journalistic, legal and non-government partners, submitted an amicus brief regarding the application for judicial review in the case of Suharto v Time Magazine (TIME) in Indonesia.

Summary of events

In May 1999, TIME published an article alleging that former Indonesian President Suharto had accumulated and hidden approximately $15 billion.  In response, Suharto sued the magazine for defamation. 

Only four items in the entire article were challenged: 
(1) a rhetorical headline – “Suharto Inc.” – which was alleged to be false because none of General Suharto’s companies is literally named “Suharto Inc.”;
(2) an illustration showing General Suharto against a background of giant banknotes, holding miniaturized photos of a mansion, a gilded plate and sacks of money, which was alleged to be false because the house belongs to one of his children, not to General Suharto himself;
(3) a quote to the effect that General Suharto’s companies probably paid only a small fraction of their actual tax obligations, which was attributed to a member of Indonesian Corruption Watch; and
(4) an allegation that ‘$9 billion of Suharto money’ was transferred from a Swiss bank to an Austrian bank, which was accompanied by specific denials issued by General Suharto and his lawyers. 

A panel of three judges of the Central Jakarta Court of First Instance considered the evidence at length and ruled on June 6, 2000, that the article was fair and balanced and that TIME had engaged in responsible journalism on a matter “in the public interest.”  On appeal, the Jakarta High Court affirmed the dismissal of the suit, confirming significant protection for a free press and demonstrating that Indonesia would not raise political leaders above the law, no matter how important they have been.

In August 2007, these lower decisions were reversed by a three-judge panel of the Supreme Court, which awarded one trillion rupiahs in damages (then approximately $106 million dollars). There were concerns about the impartiality of this panel, as all three judges who decided the appeal had been appointed by the plaintiff. 

TIME has now applied for judicial review to the Supreme Court of Indonesia.  With a variety of commercial, journalistic, legal and non-government partners, the IBAHRI has collaborated to develop an amicus brief for consideration by the court. This has now been filed.  

Read the amicus brief in English

Read the amicus brief in Indonesian

 

Back to country pages>

Back to HRI home>



IBA HOME    ABOUT THE IBA    CONTACT US    RECRUITMENT   ABOUT THIS SITE

The International Bar Association is not responsible for the content or reliability of any websites linked to from its site, and cannot accept liability for any damage or loss arising from reliance on such websites. Links to third party information should not be taken as endorsement of any kind.
We cannot guarantee that these links will work all of the time and we have no control over the availability of the linked pages.


10th Floor, 1 Stephen Street, London W1T 1AT, United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)20 7691 6868 | Fax: +44 (0)20 7691 6544

©  2004 - 2007 International Bar Association
Site powered by e-mango 
Design © International Bar Association