BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Session events Calendar//IBA//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20260426T013552Z
DTSTART:20240201T171500Z
DTEND:20240201T184500Z
SUMMARY:To prevent or to prosecute? That is the question - arbitration pr
 oceedings in relation to due diligence and fraud red flags
DESCRIPTION:Arbitration cases and due diligence can have different connec
 tions\, with criminal law implications on the background. Sometimes arbi
 tral tribunals determine whether an investor has exercised due diligence
  in light of certain circumstances\, that may have criminal relevance. S
 ometimes it is the other way round: before performing a transaction\, th
 e companies involved carry out a due diligence\, which leads to the disc
 overy of warning signs from a criminal law perspective and\, consequentl
 y\, to a claim to be managed through an arbitration. Time is often a key
  factor: red flags in terms of prevention or prosecution of potential fr
 auds shall be taken into account within proper timeframes for both crimi
 nal and arbitration cases. How all these tricky situations can be proper
 ly faced from both an arbitration and a criminal law perspective?\n
LOCATION:America do Sul room - floor E2
UID:4c19252b-d89b-4fca-8b53-9ac09a452dbb
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR