Already an IBA member? Sign in for a better website experience
The IBA’s response to the war in Ukraine
Over a period of three years, a group of global experts – convened by the Institute for Historical Justice and Reconciliation (IHJR), the International Bar Association (IBA), and the Salzburg Global Seminar – has been preparing a volume of eight in-depth case studies on contested legacies in public spaces. The analysis addresses the social, political and legal dynamics in facilitating or complicating the resolution of disputes over contested historical legacies in municipal areas.
Professor Jeffrey Golden, IBA member of the Contested Histories in Public Spaces (CHIPS) task force, commented: ‘Recently, the issue of historical legacies has been thrown into sharp focus, with citizens from cities across the world clamouring for change. Decision-makers must sit up and take notice. The legal profession has a vital role to play in scrutinising existing legislation, identifying any shortcomings and implementing positive change in cases where it is clearly not in step with modern society. It is our duty, as lawyers, to ensure both that legislation evolves to reflect changing attitudes so that all members of society are justly represented, and that the rule of law is respected. The IBA is proud to be working alongside the IHJR and the Salzburg Global Seminar on this project.’
Against the background of protests following the killing of George Floyd in the United States on 25 May 2020; a global elevation of public awareness and discourse regarding underlying continuities with the past; the toppling of statues; and renaming of streets and venues, a summary of the first of the eight case studies has been published.
Authored by IHJR Director Timothy Ryback on behalf of the group of experts, the synopsis Black Lives Matter: Toppling Colston – Vandalism or Vindication? examines the controversy behind Mr Colston, a 17th century slave trader, once described as ‘one of the most evil men in British history’. Mr Ryback references the current climate ‘highlighting the importance of historical legacies in public spaces, but also raising fundamental questions about the role of statues, monuments and street names in public life, as well as the need for established principles and processes for aligning a country’s narrative landscape with its evolving social or political circumstances, in particular, in a world of increasingly diverse and multi-ethnic societies.’ He asks ‘how does a democratic society deal… with complex historical legacies within the parameters while respecting the rule of law?’ He concludes: ‘As with the erasure of Soviet legacies three decades ago, the assault on the topographies of former slave-trading nations suggests a seismic shift in society. It also raises fundamental questions about appropriate means for re-scripting urban landscapes, but also… our understanding of representation in a representative democracy.’
Digests of the eight case studies will be published at www.ibanet.org over the coming weeks. They form a contribution to the IHJR project Contested Histories in Public Spaces – a long-term initiative intended to address controversies over statues, memorials, street names and other representations of disputed historical legacies in public spaces, and to provide policy-makers with a set of principles and best practice guidelines for tackling contestations in an effective and responsible manner.
Notes to the Editor
For further information please contact:
Romana St. Matthew - Daniel
International Bar Association
4th Floor, 10 St Bride Street,
London EC4A 4AD
Mobile: +44 (0)7940 731 915
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7842 0094
Main Office: +44 (0)20 7842 0090
Fax: +44 (0)20 7842 0091
IBA website page link for this news release:
Short link: tinyurl.com/y8akbrg4