Search results for "皇冠登一足球平台出租【扣微同号：𝟿𝟽𝟻𝟸𝟹𝟹𝟾𝟾】.bab"

This session will focus on the growth in Europe of emerging disruptive technologies in the defence sector, the journey it has to travel to match other major global powers, the awareness of the critical importance of defence technology with the challenges that Europe is facing, how regulators will seek to regulate this growing sector, the availability of funding for companies and the potential for Soonicorns to emerge.
 

HumanRightsConflicts between regional courts and national courts/governments (eg the recent Alex Saab extradition case involving Cape Verde and the ECOWAS court) and government failures to comply with the judgements of regional courts like the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights and the (now neutered) SADC Tribunal – this has potential implications for the AfCFTA.

A discussion on new and important theories of harm; the role of public interest criteria in merger assessments; and appropriate remedies to the issue.

This session is about the increasing use by clients of ethics criteria when selecting lawyers. Clients may look at track records of fraud and corruption, disciplinary or regulatory history and environmental, social and governance (ESG), ranging from diversity and inclusion standards to sustainability commitments.

• How do clients apply ethics criteria in practice?

• What policies do they use and what are the experiences?

• What does this mean for law firms and for lawyers?

• Which dilemma’s do they face when it comes to privacy? Or when it comes to acting on other (potentially) controversial matters?

• Can a law firm be too ethical and ‘prize’ itself out of the market?

We will discuss these questions with clients and managing partners of law firms.

This panel is for many the highlight of the conference. What is keeping our clients awake at night? This is where the lawyers from private practice in our audience hear what their clients are worrying about and what they want to see from their outside counsel. The in-house lawyers in our audience will pick up on the trends and challenges that their counterparts in major sponsor houses are tackling currently.

This panel is for many the highlight of the conference. What is keeping our clients awake at night? This is where the lawyers from private practice in our audience hear what their clients are worrying about and what they want to see from their outside counsel. The in-house lawyers in our audience will pick up on the trends and challenges that their counterparts in major sponsor houses are tackling currently.

How can lawyers and the international legal community contribute to shaping Ukraine’s legal system, ensuring justice, and building a robust framework for sustainable post-war recovery. On this panel we will discuss the following issues:

• Drafting legislation and policies for short- and long-term reforms;
• strengthening the independence of the judiciary;
• addressing post-war property rights and land disputes;
• defending human rights, accessing post-war reparations and damages (including environmental damage);
• harmonising legislation with EU standards;
• providing legal support for investments and economic development (including public-private partnerships).

The session will take stock of the developments made in cross-border legal practice up to now, reviewing the jurisdictions having opened their legal services market to the practice of foreign lawyers and law firms and assessing what the experience has been. The session will also discuss the rising challenges to globalisation (eg, sanctions, decoupling and de-dollarisation) and the impact, if any, on trade in legal services.

The panel will explore the differences of the rules of neutrality among these three professions; what institutions do/should do to safeguard such neutrality and whether (and what) we can learn from one another.

A hands-off pro-arbitration stance from courts and institutions was arguably necessary as arbitration evolved as a dispute resolution process, but has this gone too far?  For example, current and anticipated procedural reforms in England make the process of challenging awards – already very difficult – even more so.  Institutions scrutinize arbitral awards to varying different degrees, and in some instances not at all.  As commercial arbitration in particular is typically confidential, there may be little public scrutiny of outcomes.  Are there sufficient safeguards on the arbitral process?  What risk is there that the arbitration process becomes something which goes against the parties’ reasonable expectations without recourse, and does the pro-arbitration stance need to be revisited?

As we emerge from the unprecedented storm of pandemic based market disruptions – and in the midst of a war in Europe, ratcheting tensions in the Pacific and a looming recession in the West – the industry and practice of private equity (PE) continues to evolve rapidly. From the immediate boost in biotech and remote technologies to the short-term glimmer of special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and increasing growth and prominence of secondaries, the overlapping crises seem to have accelerated change. What lies ahead? Experts from a top PE fund in Japan and leading law firms in Hong Kong, India and Japan discuss recent trends in Asia in the PE industry and dealmaking in a novel, open and highly interactive format moderated by US and European deal lawyers.

This session is organised to discuss possible role of lawyers in using law and legal procedures to broker peace talks/ bring war crimes to justice and related issues.

 

Don't forget to attend SPPI Showcase - Law not war: part 1

Digital market regulations in Europe − particularly the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act − are designed to limit the dominance of major gatekeepers, strengthen competition and enhance user protection. However, their implementation continues to face notable challenges. Meanwhile, digital market regulation in the US is currently characterised by a shift away from comprehensive, proactive legislation (like the EU's Digital Markets Act) toward a reliance on traditional, ex-post antitrust enforcement often influenced by political, economic and trade-related debates. Whereas in Africa, the COMESA Competition and Consumer Commission adopted new digital markets regulations in December 2025 aimed at overseeing gatekeepers operating within the COMESA region.

The panel will explore the current challenges facing digital market regulations, discuss ways to enhance regulatory frameworks and assess the effectiveness of these measures from both European, American and African perspectives. It will also consider how competition authorities can administer enforcement penalties, promote fair and balanced regulation without slowing innovation, address data privacy concerns and manage the interests of both gatekeepers and consumers.

The independence of the legal profession is a critical requirement for maintaining the rule of law. An important subset of the independence of the legal profession is the independence of the judiciary. One particularly invidious form of attack is the subtle and non-obvious approach of undermining or hijacking the judicial appointments process. Where the judicial appointments process is unduly influenced or controlled, it results in the appointment of judicial officers who have lost their independence even before they get onto the bench, as they are beholden to those who facilitate their appointments. These facilitators could be members of the executive arm of government, influential politicians or businessmen, or sitting or past judicial officers.

This approach to undermining judicial independence is coming to a head now in Israel, where the Executive arm of government is no longer relying on subtlety but is seeking to take absolute control of the judicial appointments process and to arrogate powers to itself to overrule judicial decisions.

Please note that even if you are unable to join the Annual Conference, you can still register for the Rule of Law Symposium for free. If you are NOT already registered for the Annual Conference and would like to attend the Rule of Law Symposium, you must pre-register by Wednesday 1 November by completing the Rule of Law Symposium registration form. There is no registration fee to attend the Symposium.