Search results for "最全合集【嶶信11零零8748】泡良达人金先生 约炮感情空虚的87年跨国公司女高管高京熙推特福利姬onlyfans主播所有视频资源全部作品.hpr" in Articles / Webpages

Issue 21 – Friday 11 September 2020

The 21st edition of the Monitor covers topics including a fire in Moria refugee camp forcing refugees ill with Covid-19 to flee and the growing crisis for worldwide refugee camps, the effect on low-income earners, including redundancies and homelessness and the difficulties for those living with disability in the reopening of schools.

Issue 11 – Friday 3 July 2020

The latest issue of the IBAHRI Covid-19 Human Rights Monitor contains updates on gender-based violence and women’s health in India and Northern Ireland. Also: refugee camps, including the Kakuma Refugee Camp in Kenya, which has no reported cases of Covid-19 to date.

Highlights from the 11th Annual IBA World Life Sciences Conference, 11–13 June, Boston

From 11–13 June, leading legal experts in life sciences and healthcare convened at the Ritz-Carlton, Boston, for the 11th Annual IBA World Life Sciences Conference. The event, co-hosted by the IBA Intellectual Property and Healthcare and Life Sciences Law Committees, brought together regulators, corporate counsel, private practitioners and academics to address the most pressing developments at the intersection of law, innovation and global health. This articles considers the key themes and panel highlights of the conference.

IBAHRI and ATI pen letter to Turkey’s President condemning conviction of 11 medical professionals

The International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), in conjunction with the Anti-Torture Initiative (ATI), has written to Turkey’s President, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, condemning the conviction of 11 members of the Turkish Medical Association (TMA) Central Council on terrorism charges.

Fighting corruption in Brazil: Federal Decree No 11,129 of 11 July 2022, regulating anti-corruption law

The Anti-Corruption Law was first regulated, at the federal level, by Decree No 8,420 of 18 March 2015. On 12 July 2022, more than seven years later, Federal Decree No 11,129 of 11 July 2022, which regulates Anti-Corruption Law and repeals Decree No. 8,420/2015, was published by the Brazilian government. This article provides a detailed overview of the new Decree.

Multinational LATAM companies in distress: Chapter 11 or Chapter 15 of US Bankruptcy Code – opportunities and pitfalls

Report on the session of the Insolvency Section of the Latin American Regional Forum at the IBA Annual Conference in Miami

Latin American airlines file for Chapter 11 in response to Covid-19: forum shopping or sound strategy?

A webinar presented by the IBA Insolvency Section, 8 September 2020, 1400-1500 BST

Chapter 11 rehabilitation proceedings in Korea of a shipping company - Maritime and Transport Law Committee, July 2020

This article is aimed at providing detailed information about the procedures and pertinent details of rehabilitation or Chapter 11 proceedings of Korea regarding shipping companies.

Report on Tables 11 and 12 of Interactive Workshop: Selected corporate topics connected to developments and consequences of the global pandemic – part one

Report on session at 6th IBA Global Entrepreneurship Conference, 16 – 17 May 2022, presented by the IBA Closely Held and Growing Business Enterprise Committee

A Brief Discussion on the Implications, Regulation and Prospects of AI in Dispute Resolution Practice with a Focus on China

China’s Foreign State Immunity Law 2023: Implications for Enforcement of Judgments and Arbitral Awards against States and State Entities in the People’s Republic of China, Hong Kong, and Macau

The new Foreign State Immunity Law 2023 of the People’s Republic of China came into force on 1 January 2024. This shifts the country (as well as its special administrative regions, Hong Kong and Macau) away from absolute state immunity to restrictive state immunity, bringing it more in line with the relatively prevalent practice among the international community. This article discusses the status of state immunity in public international law, analyses the new law’s provisions and examines practical challenges that will be faced by those seeking to utilise this law to enforce judgments or awards against foreign states and state entities, and the new law’s innovations that go beyond the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property of 2004 and the UK State Immunity Act 1978.

Mediating Disputes Involving Chinese Parties

Mediation is on the rise internationally as a means to settle disputes in a cost-effective manner. Chinese parties appear to be increasingly interested in mediation as an option. This article examines the evolving landscape of mediation in China and internationally. It considers how mediation for Chinese parties is evolving and whether mediation is a good option for Chinese parties in cross-border disputes. Commercial mediation has seen remarkable growth, bolstered by a supportive PRC judicial system and legislative initiatives encouraging parties to find harmonious ways to resolve disputes. The article analyses the three primary types of mediation in China: people’s mediation, administrative mediation, and commercial mediation. It also looks at mediation rules and proceedings in common law jurisdictions, such as Hong Kong, Singapore, and the United States. The article anecdotally considers the cultural elements, emphasising the Chinese parties’ preference for evaluative mediation styles as a reflection of civil law. Through case studies of international disputes involving Chinese and US parties, the article illustrates the practical dynamics of mediation involving Chinese parties and underscores the importance of cultural sensitivity in international mediation. As Chinese parties continue to go global, mediation is emerging as an attractive option for efficient and cost-effective dispute resolution. This analysis assesses whether the promotion of mediation is yielding tangible outcomes and explores the future of mediation involving Chinese and foreign parties.

Utilising Generative AI in Businesses: Risks and Best Practices

The rise in popularity of generative artificial intelligence (‘generative AI’) has ignited the discussion on whether junior employees can be replaced by it. Some have gone to the extent of questioning whether professionals, such as lawyers, can also be replaced by generative AI. Is it wise to replace junior employees or lawyers with generative AI? What factors should be considered before deploying generative AI tools in your business? To consider these questions, we first need to understand the basic workings of generative AI and what it can offer. Fundamentally, AI is intelligence that is not biological. The general understanding is that machines will be ascribed with this intelligence. These machines have the ability to interpret, learn from and process external data in a way that is similar to the capabilities of the human mind. Generative AI is a type of AI program that generates content from a data set. It uses deep learning, a type of machine learning system that behaves like a neural network to simulate the functions of a human brain. In other words, it can mimic human intelligence by exhibiting analytical skills to create new content. Not only can generative AI be utilised in chatbot programs to create text, but it can also be used in programs that can create images, sound or videos. This article will consider two major forms of generative AI, in the context of risks to businesses: chatbots using generative pre-trained transformer technology programs; and image generating programs.

China's regulation of artificial intelligence – progress and challenges

Artificial intelligence (AI) is developing rapidly in China, with the number of patents and the size of the market both ranking highly among countries. However, this rapid development has posed new challenges to the legal framework, ethical norms and social governance, prompting China to continuously adjust and improve the relevant regulatory system.

China’s restrictions on cross-border transfer of personal information: an update on regulatory policy and practical implications

This article will outline the development of China’s restrictions on the cross-border transfer of personal information (PI export), detailing PI export mechanisms provided by the Personal Information Protection Law. It will also explain the practical implications of the restrictions.

The SEC’s tough stance on intermediary institutions: compliance and litigation risks

This article discusses the recent SEC case involving PwC and highlights the wider implications for intermediary institutions providing professional services in a tightened regulatory and enforcement regime in China’s banking and financial sector.

Alipay and the impact of e-payment systems resulting in new regulations in China and other jurisdictions - China Working Group

By Yi-An (Ann) Lai. Alipay and the impact of e-payment systems resulting in new regulations in China and other jurisdictions.

A framework for digital platform regulation

In rapid succession, a number of jurisdictions have moved away from focusing on antitrust enforcement to the proposed regulation of digital platforms. Ostensibly, the regulatory focus is about competition and potential concerns that traditional ex post enforcement may be ill-equipped to address the power of digital platforms. This article focuses on the realities of what platform regulation might mean, and how to better frame and structure the nature of appropriate regulation. This article first identifies a number of the different approaches to regulation that various jurisdictions have put forward, and then lays out six basic principles for platform regulation to help address some of the potential harms that such approaches may unwittingly be pursuing.

The Global Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Commercial Dispute Resolution in the First Year

While the pandemic disruption has extended for far longer than initially expected, courts (after the first wave), arbitral institutions and stakeholders in commercial dispute resolution have largely continued operations, increasingly supported by innovative digital technology, flexible scheduling and flexible cost structures, among other tools.

Current US Sanctions with Respect to the Russian Federation: Successes, Challenges and a New Model for Economic Statecraft

As the United States has increased its use of sanctions, it has also refined the craft of sanctions. New sanctions concepts or tools have emerged in the last decade, leading to increased complexity in understanding, implementing and complying with these restrictions. Nowhere has this been seen more than in the US response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. The use of sanctions as a tool of foreign policy has reached a critical juncture. This article discusses the successes of US sanctions with respect to Russia, novel challenges that have emerged and how sanctions infrastructure may evolve to address these challenges.

Advocate General Henrik Saugmandsgaard Øe questions transfers to third countries

In light of the Schrems II case (C-311/18) the ECJ’s Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe sees no reasons to declare decision 2010/87/EU on Standard Contractual Clauses (SCC) invalid. Companies can use this safeguard to justify international data transfers. The Advocate General argues that Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) can examine individual cases and take appropriate measures. However, this argumentation could lead to a DPA banning an international data transfer for reasons outside of the sphere

Offshore finance: UK government halts push for greater transparency

In March 2019, the UK Parliament was due to debate a Bill requiring the UK’s crown dependencies – Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man – to introduce public registers to bring about greater transparency in the hope this would prevent illicit financial flows

Duty to warn in construction contracts

Joint criminal enterprise in the Kosovo specialist chambers

In this article the authors discuss whether the KSC will follow the ICTY in interpreting article 16.1 of its statute to embrace the wide constructed liability of JCE III. They suggest there are good reasons why it should not: the terms of article 16.1 of the KSC Statute do not explicitly provide for JCE III. The ICTY Appeals Chamber read JCE III liability into article 7.1 of the ICTY Statute on the basis that it was ‘firmly established in customary international law’, yet JCE III has proved controversial a

A future bill to improve France’s anti-corruption framework

Five years on from the enactment of the Sapin 2 law, the ambition of which is to ‘bring French legislation to best European and international standards and to contribute to a positive image of France in the world’ , an evaluation of its effectiveness was carried out by a commission led by two Members of Parliament (MPs) Raphaël Gauvain and Olivier Marleix. The commission published a report listing 50 recommendations for improving France’s anti-corruption endeavours. The two MPs then decided to convert this into a draft bill which will consider some of the recommendations listed in the report. This draft bill, which has not yet been published, is currently under government review before its submission to parliament which is expected to take place in November 2021. The main areas for improvement identified by the MPs, which should be the subject of the draft bill, are outlined in this article.

Bigger Isn’t Always Better: the Trend Towards More Extensive Investigations in European Merger Control

The European Commission’s (the ‘Commission’) merger control investigations have become increasingly complex in recent years, in particular through requests for large document production and more input from third parties. This project of building cases with larger datasets may be well-intentioned, but the steps needed to digest the resulting information create real difficulties for accurate decision-making. This article highlights some of those issues, and proposes suggestions to address them.

American presidency: executive orders

IBA Global Insight April/May 2017 - Serving as Deputy Assistant Attorney General under George W Bush, John Yoo authored the ‘Torture Memos’ that provided the legal basis for US detention and interrogation policies following 9/11. Here, he assesses Donald Trump’s early days in power and says the use of executive orders is damaging his presidency.

English Anti-Suit Injunctions in Support of Arbitration

This article considers the position under English law for parties seeking to injunct proceedings in other jurisdictions in breach of a valid agreement to arbitrate. English courts have shown great willingness to grant such injunctions in appropriate cases. Recent case law demonstrates the English courts’ commercial mindedness and adherence to a strongly pro-arbitration policy. However, different considerations apply in instances where the non-arbitration proceedings are issued in a European Union state.

Android Auto: now that Bronner is dead, might innovation follow suit?

The recent judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Android Auto case represents a development in EU competition law, in relation to the essential facilities doctrine (EFD). The dispute originated from Google’s denial of interoperability between its Android Auto interface and Enel X’s JuicePass application – a refusal sanctioned by the Italian Competition Authority (ICA) as an abuse of a dominant position under Article 102 TFEU. The indispensability test affirmed in the landmark Bronner decision, was reconsidered in Android Auto, where the CJEU opened the door to granting access to a dominant platform, which had been developed as an open model, if it makes a product more attractive to consumers. This article investigates the broader consequences of this doctrinal shift: the gradual weakening of the indispensability threshold in digital environments, the increasing regulatory burdens placed on dominant digital platforms, and the potential ramifications for innovation, investment incentives, and legal predictability.

Expedited Arbitration Procedures as A Fast and Cost-effective Option – User Experience and Practice

Arbitration is no longer perceived as a cheap and fast option for resolving commercial disputes. Against the backdrop of increased user dissatisfaction with time and costs in arbitration, this article takes a fresh look at expedited procedure as one of the most effective techniques in response to this concern. The article begins by outlining the main features of expedited arbitration and then explores three areas where procedural rules diverge: (1) whether expedited procedures apply automatically, (2) the value threshold for their application, and (3) the appointment of arbitrator/s. Building on this general overview of procedural and institutional framework, the main part of the article identifies various genuine or perceived challenges encountered with expedited procedures. The article considers issues such as the suitability of expedited procedures for arbitration matters, their ability to deliver genuinely fast dispute resolution, challenges encountered with the constitution of the arbitral tribunal and due process considerations. These issues are analysed through the lens of user experience and practice gathered from caselaw, doctrine and empirical evidence, including from surveys conducted by the Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy (SIDRA) since 2019.