Search results for "最全合集【嶶信11零零8748】重磅！纱姬舞团 原映秀模特编号01 顶B摇摆裸舞最新流出上线推特福利姬onlyfans主播所有视频资源全部作品.iax" in Conferences / Events

This session will discuss:

• What are the future expectations of ESG factors within the companies?
• Does the social object of a traditional company will be understood as a real social purpose?
• Can profit financing tackle social and environmental gaps?
• What exactly a sustainable world of 2100 will require?

The same topics from session one will run again, please select another two topics to join.

<b>1. IP in the metaverse and beyondb>

<b>2. Going green – protecting and encouraging green technology innovation with IPb>

<b>3. New framework for transatlantic data transfersb>

<b>4. Navigating the dynamics of cyber risk landscape in M&A transactions and beyondb>

<b>5. Incentivising employees – retention following mergersb>

<b>6.

The struggle to address the global access to justice and access to legal services crises continues, with the pandemic having taken its toll on those in need. Efforts to innovate and re-imagine the delivery of legal services have taken a new turn, one that includes permitting alternative business structures and professionals other than lawyers delivering legal services direct to consumers. In a growing number of jurisdictions, regulators and the organized bar have begun implementing limited, supervised testing of new methods of delivery via a policy tool called a regulatory sandbox. What is a sandbox and how does it work? Can it really increase access and do so in a way that preserves professional values and public protection? Experts directly involved with their implementation will tackle these and other questions.

Price: $127

Book social event

HumanRightsRuleOfLawThe futurist Ray Kurzweil has forecasted that artificial intelligence may reach or exceed levels of human intelligence by 2029. It does not matter whether the timing of the prediction is accurate. What matters is how we deal with a technology that has the potential to outpace human development. Therefore, a forward-looking regulation is required in order to protect a humane society and human rights. Today, we can observe the rapid progression of self-driving cars or robots in healthcare. What we have not yet seen to the same degree is how human judgment is taken over by AI. If we want to preserve a human society where humans continue to make the final decisions, we need, however, to make sure that humans remain in control. These considerations hold particularly true for the areas of advocacy, justice, law enforcement, and public administration. While still in its early stages, digitization is also advancing in these sectors, which are central to the functioning of each democratic society. Stressing the importance of a human society is not denying the benefits of innovation and progress. For example, studies have shown that less than 50% of the population have access to the legal system in some jurisdictions. Technology – including AI-based instruments – can help broaden such access due to lower costs and easy access. Intelligent systems could for instance, be used to largely automate the submission of briefs and the issuing of court orders in civil proceedings. However, once AI-based technology is applied in the courtroom or in the decision-making process, fundamental legal rights could be seriously affected. While lawyers will adapt their working methods and use new technologies, they will continue to consider themselves as advocates of those who need them and as guardians of the rule of law as an overarching principle of freedom and democracy. This will not apply, on an algorithm, be it as intelligent as it may be. Bars should, therefore, actively participate in the regulation of AI being applied in the areas of advocacy. Acknowledging the increasing importance of AI in modern society, and the expected benefits when used at the service of the legal profession, key questions need to be discussed when drafting a new framework on AI.

The panel will explore the types of alleged wrongdoing on which multi-lateral banks are currently focusing, as well as the latest updates on their investigative methods and potential consequences, including suspension and debarment. 

The rise in the frequency of online cross-border legal services, already in evidence before the pandemic but doubtless increased by home working and travel restrictions during the pandemic, poses challenging questions about whether bars’ existing regulation of foreign lawyers, often based on their physical presence, needs to be reconsidered in the light of digital advances.

The Pandora Papers leak of confidential files again highlighted that clients may seek to misuse corporate structures and trust arrangements to hide assets. While the structures may be lawfully established in many jurisdictions, the assets placed in them can be tainted as deriving from the proceeds of crime.

Accordingly, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has called on various professions, including Lawyers, Accountants, Financial advisers, Trustee service providers and Real Estate dealers to do more to prevent financial crime.
FATF has support from groups ranging from the UN, OECD, World Bank, and Transparency International, to national and regional law enforcement agencies. And the G-20 nations’ leaders are pressing for beneficial ownership registers to be compiled in high risk countries. 

This session will explore how, and why, banking and financial controls seeking to detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing have been gradually expanded into the traditional professions, including:
• What is the FATF’s perspective on the major risk areas, and how they should be addressed?
• How have Bar Associations and Law Societies around the world tried to educate, guide, and monitor their members commitment to AML requirements?
• What more can be done to make the professions resilient against financial crime, and ensure AML-CFT controls are sufficiently adapted from their banking origins to meet the special features of the legal profession?

In this session, we will take an in-depth look at the following topics:

• Transparency of legal persons and legal arrangements;
• the next frontier in anti-money laundering (AML) and sanctions;
• financial exclusion problems: are law firms expected to look and act like a bank?;
• 'Failure to prevent' offences — interaction and intrusion into legal practice.

The session time listed is British Summer Time (BST).
Representation of companies engaged in cross-border commerce means that the contemporary lawyer must be aware of legal issues from other jurisdictions. Lawyers may themselves engage in activities, virtually or in person, in other jurisdictions. Jurisdictions vary in their approaches to lawyers not licensed by them nonetheless acting for clients within their borders. Distinct differences exist regarding approaches to discovery, the boundaries of unauthorised practice of law, treatment of attorney client privilege, and requirements for mandatory continuing legal education, among others. Certain common law jurisdictions are decentralised as well in their approach to the regulation of lawyers as well as cross border practice, adding another layer of considerations. This session reviews some of the more common issues lawyers address in these circumstances and discusses how bar associations may assist.

All sessions are being recorded, unless otherwise stated.

"The system of institutionalized pro bono reflects what is best about the legal profession: private sector lawyers marshalling their resources to advance the interests of the poor and underserved. Yet the relationship between pro bono and the public good is more subtle and complex." (Scott L. Cummings, The Politics of Pro Bono, UCLA School of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series Paper No, 04-16, 2004, p.99)

Moral neutrality, business grounds and competing demands from liberal public interest groups and conservative organisations, can make it difficult to pursue justice-seeking pro bono efforts on a number of fronts. For example, the trans rights movement for extending basic legal rights and protections for a marginalized community has met with deep resistance in some corners and another example involves immigration rights. Pro bono efforts in the US during the Trump administration (and in some instances continuing through today) were at times frustrated with respect to the resettlement of Central American asylum seekers and refugees (in many instances involving children) as some law firms avoid taking “political” stances on these issues within their pro bono programs. The Afghan and Ukrainian crises are bringing similar concerns to the fore in Europe. Within large corporate law firms, which are the dominant providers of pro bono legal services, is it still legitimate to demand of pro bono lawyers to be morally neutral and stay clear of public interest lawyering which uses the law as a vehicle to combat social injustice?

SustainabilityFocusHumanRightsThis session will look at how human rights breaches feature in criminal enforcement action against corporates. Consideration will be given to the shifting focus from corruption to human rights. The session will look at how these issues can arise, including supply chain issues, fraudulent disclosure and climate control.

SUSTAINABILITY FOCUS sessions marked as such are part of the IBA Annual Conference 2022 sustainability focus on Tuesday and Thursday, grouping sessions discussing different aspects of ESG and sustainability across the different legal fields.