Search results for "ug环球假台包杀【Q/微同步：9683111】.nux"

Alison Taylor, a Clinical Associate Professor at the New York University Stern School of Business and Executive Director of Ethical Systems, recently published Higher Ground. In an interview with Nicola Bonucci, Alison will examine her acclaimed book’s main themes, including why running a business has become so complicated and how businesses can act responsibly in the modern world.

An opportunity to discuss the appropriate standard against which conduct ought to be assessed, how that standard is changing and how to balance prices, innovation, quality, incentives to invest etc.

One of the greatest threats to democracy in Latin America is no longer the old-fashioned coup. The new way to autocracy is more subtle, with lawfully elected leaders systematically eroding key safeguards to the separation of powers. They do so by chipping away at judicial independence, fair trial standards, electoral fairness, civic space, freedom of expression and freedom of the press. This is coupled with persistent and pervasive levels of corruption. It leads to governments stacking courts and undermining the autonomy of the judiciary, with the aim of limiting the checks on executive power.

Against this backdrop, the critical importance of a robust, independent judiciary cannot be overstated. A strong judiciary has proven to be a bulwark against democratic backsliding in many Latin American countries like Brazil, when the federal justice system upheld the electoral results in 2022; or Mexico, where the Supreme Court is resisting the government’s attempts to introduce unconstitutional reforms that would bolster executive power; or Guatemala, whose Constitutional Court ensured the transfer of power to the duly elected candidate Bernardo Arévalo, despite attempts to overturn the electoral result. 

This session will explore the intricacies of a complex vision of the rule of law in Latin American countries. On one side, the pragmatic need to tackle the plagues of corruption and organised crime. On the other, the necessity to build a system of checks and balances with a specific focus on the role of judges and prosecutors.

The rise of digital nomads, satellite employees and Employers of Record (EORs) are reshaping the employment landscape. How can global employers best deal with the legal and managerial challenges related to people working from various jurisdictions? In this session we will consider the contractual solutions, employment rights, social security, immigration and tax implications that employers need to be aware of.

Environmental, social and governance (ESG) has become an increasing focus for employers, employee representatives and applicants alike. This session will consider market practices regarding ESG, the importance of employers being aware of the impact and the potential fallout from ESG issues. We will examine the impact of ESG in the workplace; in particular, how ESG can impact an employer’s policies and an employee’s freedom of expression and how those issues can subsequently be balanced. We will also discuss whether and in what way the implementation of ESG in corporate culture, in the cooperation between employers, employees and employee representatives, and in the area of HR policies, helps to attract applicants and retain employees.

A dialogue between Andrea Appella and Professor Stefano Quintarelli.

•    How are athletes’ rights and duties taken into account in modern sport?
•    Gender equality in sports today: is it the beginning of a new era?
•    The fight against racism and violence and for integrity: the example of FIFA.
•    The specifics of ethics in sports: tools and objectives.
•    The fight against doping: an old fight looking for a better outcome today?
•    Sport as a soft power: is it a political instrument to further peace?
•    Sanctions in sports and international trade: are we talking about the same creatures?

The session will explore how the rules and practice of international trade are evolving, as reflected in the expanded use of trade defence tools such as trade remedies, safeguards, unilateral tariffs and countermeasures, the return of managed trade arrangements and the reordering of global trading blocs. The session will be practical and forward-looking; it will focus on what lawyers need to know to help clients structure their supply chains and the extent to which domestic courts and international institutions like the WTO can offer meaningful recourse to protect parties’ interests in rules-based trade.

Certain states and non-governmental organisations have voiced concerns about the use of international arbitration to resolve disputes involving complex environmental issues. Among the criticisms of investor–state arbitration is that arbitrators often fail to consider a state’s domestic and international obligations to safeguard the environment, sometimes even at the expense of the investors’ rights. Additionally, some jurisdictions in Asia have established arbitration-friendly legal frameworks, bolstering confidence for both Asian and non-Asian parties in selecting an arbitration seat. This Oxford-style panel will delve into these two issues. The house will provide some motions. One panellist will defend the motion and the other will rebut it.
• First motion: this house believes that the international arbitration legal framework is well-equipped to handle cases involving complex environmental issues.
• Second motion: ‘The Battle of Seats’ – this house believes that Asia-based seats will continue to increase in popularity in the coming decade.

This session will discuss developments in the practice of litigation, including: (i) the landscape of disputes involving new currencies; (ii) disputes that create a conflict between the creditor and the shareholder; and (iii) the funding of disputes.

• Commercial arbitration: non-signatories sought to be joined, what limits are there?
• Sports arbitration: avoiding ‘forced arbitration’ for athletes
• Can we escape an arbitration agreement (vitiated consent,termination, etc)?
• Investment arbitration: issues of consent

Whilst any lawyer will tell you that every M&A (mergers and acquisitions) transaction takes a course of its own due to its own individuality/sector, there are nevertheless a number of fundamental essentials which every M&A lawyer – whether newly qualified or otherwise – needs to know.

During this session, our expert panellists will cover key topics which any newly qualified M&A legal professional can expect to encounter in their first years of legal practice, as well as sharing individual transaction challenges and successes.

RuleOfLawFrom the outset of the pandemic, barristers and advocates recognised and were supportive of the attenuations to the justice system, which were necessary to ensure that justice could be delivered in the circumstances, which prevailed. In that context, it was accepted that remote hearings were necessary to ensure that system of justice continued to function. These remote hearings and other arrangements were however introduced as part of an emergency response. There was no time to gather any of the necessary stakeholder requirements nor to consult, design, test and implement a reformed system that would ensure these requirements were met in a sustainable manner. Against this background, it should not therefore come as a surprise to find that, for some, although the reforms that have been introduced have successfully avoided justice grinding to a standstill, they have not achieved the necessary or optimal levels of suitability or practicability and have arguably weakened adherence to some core principles of justice. Indeed in several areas the changes introduced have been regressive, limiting and jeopardizing access to justice and introducing impediments to the proper conduct of court proceedings.

This session will examine the benefits and drawbacks of the new ways conducting trails during the pandemic and try and assess their overall impact. Speakers will reflect a variety of different jurisdictions and perspectives

This session will discuss developments in mediation, including: (i) the advancement of hybrid dispute resolution processes; (ii) the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in mediation; and (iii) ethics governing lawyers and mediators in a mediation process. 

Advancements in technology are changing lawyers’ work as we've known it. Whether the legal profession will successfully navigate the myriad of problems and opportunities arising in the digital space remains to be seen. AI ranks at the top of the IBA’s strategic plan and many other organisations’ priorities. This panel, composed of regulators, industry experts and lawyers, will delve into how the legal services landscape is changing amidst regulatory developments across various jurisdictions.

The legal world is facing a generational shift in expectations around work-life balance, purpose and firm culture. This session brings together law firm leaders who are rethinking how they hire, train, lead and retain talent. What’s working? What isn’t? And what do Gen Z lawyers really want?

Communicating across cultures involves recognising and bridging differences in communication styles, values and behaviours shaped by diverse cultural backgrounds. Effective cross-cultural communication is essential in today's globalised world, offering both significant benefits and potential challenges. The power of cross-cultural communication includes enhanced collaboration and teamwork, broader perspectives being introduced to enrich the decision-making process and market expansion for businesses. The risks and challenges of cross-cultural communication includes misunderstandings and conflict, stereotyping and oversimplification of cultural issues, and language barriers. By acknowledging the complexities of cross-cultural communication and actively working towards understanding and adaptation, employers can leverage the strengths of cultural diversity while mitigating potential pitfalls. Our speakers will discuss how we can assist employers in developing strategies for effective cross-cultural communication both internally and externally, and how we can enhance diversity and equality in the workplace.